timesunion.com February 20 2015 12:09:21 PM
You are sitting across the table from the person who has the power to hire you and they ask, “Tell us why you were let go from your last job?” Yikes.
It’s the question that you bump into every time you have an interview and each time it’s asked you stumble around for the answer.
Don’t fret. Here are some tips on how to prepare so that the next time you run into it you won’t feel like the interview is going sideways with no hope of recovery.
1. Be prepared for the question and work out the answer well in advance of an interview.
2. Make a list of all of the reasons you were unemployed for that time and be prepared to also identify the things you accomplished while you were out of the job market.
3. Even if you were let go from your last job, chances are you can still come up with a few positive things that happened at with your last employer. What projects did you work on that highlight the skills that will be helpful to your prospective employer?
4. Talk about what you learned from the experience you had with the employer who let you go. It’s admirable when a person can take a look back at a bad experience and describe how it gave them a better understanding of something or provided insight into something they needed to learn.
5. It’s never a good idea to put 100% of the blame on the previous employer. The person interviewing you wants to know that you are capable of getting through a difficult time and ended up with some significant expertise.
Read the original article HERE
at the timesunion.com
businessinsider.com February 17 2015 12:27:43 PM
The process of finding a new job is intimidating.
From meticulously reading over your resume, to expertly crafting a cover letter, to worrying about whether or not you'll make the right first impression, it's a stressful situation to be in. That process can become even more overwhelming if you're switching career paths.
But changing your career may not be as hard as you think, says Allen Blue, the co-founder and vice president of product management at LinkedIn.
Blue made a significant career switch himself — long before co-founding LinkedIn, he designed scenery and lighting for stage productions.
Here are some of the key takeaways from our conversation.
- Other people can be the key to success when changing career paths. "In the end you never make that career switch alone," Blue told us."People will help you make that transition. And the people you know right now will help you find those people. That's the main resource that matters." People will help you learn new things, explore new positions, and give you your first job in the new space, according to Blue.
- It's okay if your previous experience doesn't line up with your new career choice. Blue said he had no idea what he was doing when he transitioned into the tech and business space. In fact, many early LinkedIn employees didn't. Social web apps weren't nearly as big as they are today back in 2002, so the LinkedIn team had some room to experiment and figure out what worked."There was lots of room for failing and starting all over again," Blue said. That may not be the case in sectors that are already well-established, but don't let the fact that you may not have experience on paper discourage you.
- Companies may even benefit from hiring someone with a different background. People with different experience may be able to attack problems in new ways, Blue explained. He recalled a human resources survey from Google he came across last year. The survey found that standards such as GPA scores didn't matter much when it came to success — it was more about personality traits like determination. But what was interesting, however, was the fact that engineers within Google took the survey to learn more about the company's HR practices. And the method they used produced some compelling results, even though they approached it in a different way than someone in human resources might. "Having people come in and think about problems differently is actually super valuable," Blue said.
Read the original article at BusinessInsider.com here: http://www.businessinsider.com/career-advice-linkedin-2015-2#ixzz3S2J6GTfE
CIO.com December 10 2014 02:33:47 PM
Using data from DICE.com, CIO.com reveals tech professionals' 10 most desirable states to relocate to.
1. It's probably no surprise that California tops the list of most desirable job-relocation destinations. According to DICE, Silicon Valley topped the list of highest paid talent in 2014.
2. New York, second on the list, tops all East Coast relocation destinations. "Silicon Alley" salaries rose 5% last year, and the choice of tech jobs is expansive. Like California, the cost of living is high, but salaries are equally at the top end.
The remaining eight spots in order are:
4. New Jersey
9. North Carolina
To read the original article in all its glory, click HERE
and read it at CIO.com.
Monster.com November 25 2014 12:35:32 PMMonster Contributing Writer Catherine Conlan looks at five fatal mistakes interviewees make that could prevent them from landing a job. Read the original story HERE
---- Could one of these five fatal mistakes be keeping you from landing a job?
If you’re being called in for interviews but can’t quite seem to land a job, it’s time to take a look at what might be holding you back. Here are some ways you might be falling short in job interviews. You let down your guard
While it’s important to connect with interviewers, you don’t want to get too friendly, says Jeff Altman, host of Job Search Radio. He recently had a candidate on the final long-distance interview before being flown in for the in-person interview, and it was going very well. The area head and candidate were getting along great, laughing and joking with each other. Then the area head asked a question and the candidate replied, “I'll give you the answer at the whiteboard when we meet."
“There was no meeting,” Altman says. “The candidate was rejected. He had confused the camaraderie of the moment and lost track of the fact that this person was still evaluating him and had every reason to expect an answer.” You wave red flags
Obviously, you don’t want to lie in a job interview. But if you’ve made it to that stage, you need to keep in mind that hiring managers are looking for red flags, so don’t show them any.
For example, if you ran your own business only to have it fail, talk about the success it did have when times were good instead of focusing on what went wrong. “A business owner who failed to renegotiate a lease and lost access to his facility is not a good explanation as to why you want another job,” says Robert Meier, founder of Job Market Experts. You don’t pay attention to detail
We’re not talking about proofreading your resume for typos -- that should be a given. “One small mistake that's made all too often is not accounting for time zones when doing a phone or video interview,” says Chris Brown, director of human resources at InterCall.
He says he scheduled to interview someone located in California at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific, but the interviewee logged in for his interview at 1 p.m. Pacific, clearly not accounting for the time change. The interviewee missed the call. “This simple mistake knocked him out of the running for the position,” Brown says. You talk about retiring
While retirement is a natural topic of discussion for workers of a certain age, this kind of “honest dialog” can be a detriment, Meier says. Talking about retirement can make it seem like you’re counting the days until you can stop working.
He also encourages military veterans to avoid using the word “retirement” to describe the end of their service. “The word ‘retirement’ should be banished from your vocabulary.” You fail to follow up
“Sending a thank you to the interviewers after an interview is good form and shows courtesy, respect for their time, and genuine interest in the job,” says Trevor Simm, founder and president of OpalStaff. “Plus, it keeps the lines of communication open with the employer. Always follow up after interviews.”
Mark Gottschalk October 31 2014 12:16:20 PM
The Washington Post reported
on a study from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis that concluded that mothers outperformed childless women at almost every stage of the game. In fact, more kids equaled more productivity. ...the authors found that within the first five or so years of their career, women who never have children substantially underperform those who do. (The difference in productivity between women with one child and those with no children is more muted using a different ranking for research. But in both cases, mothers with at least two children perform the best.)
While the news is mostly about the moms -- who have routinely been discriminated against in the workplace due to perceptions of decreased work effectiveness -- the effect wasn't limited to women. Fathers of multiple children were more productive than fathers of one child and childless men. For men, fathers of one child and those without children performed similarly throughout much of their careers. But men with two or more kids were more productive than both groups.
The study does indicate that young children take a toll on work, but the increased productivity over the long term more than offset this effect. But as any parent knows, the days are long and the years are short. That’s the case here, too. Mothers tend to be more productive both before and long after the birth of their children. When that work is smoothed out over the course of a career, the paper found, they are more productive on average than their peers.
Honestly, the result shouldn't be a surprise. Parents have responsibilities to their kids that they take seriously. Providing financially for children, typically through work, is a gigantic one of those responsibilities. Singles or childless couples (excluding unique exceptions) have far fewer people depending on them and are thus freer to focus on their own needs and desires -- and the ability to act on them. Parents feel obligated to set good examples for their kids. Reliability, dependability, and hard work are just a few of the bits of character they usually try to impart. There is also the looming need to financially provide for them today and, if able, into their college years.
I think it's important not to misinterpret cause and effect here. Simply having another child won't make mothers or fathers more productive. Rather, in the domain of the more privileged women and men looked at in the study -- who have "careers" as opposed to "jobs" -- additional children are presumably well planned for. And these parents might be more driven or more organized innately in ways that let them handle both home and work roles more effectively than most of us.
to read the original article.
ferret.com.au October 24 2014 03:13:25 PMFerret
, an Australia Manufacturing, Industrial and Mining Directory, cites a report today about the trend of onshoring -- i.e. bringing back home to the US -- manufacturing work from China:
A new report by management consultancy firm Boston Consulting Group suggests the number of US firms onshoring from China has risen for the third straight year. AFP reports
that BCG’s Made In America, Again survey investigated the views of 252 respondents, senior executives from companies in a variety of manufacturing sub-sectors.
Overall, 16 per cent of executives from companies currently manufacturing in China said they were already actively onshoring. The inaugural 2012 report saw 7 per cent giving this response.
“These findings show that not only does interest in repatriating production to the US and creating American jobs remain strong but also that companies are acting on those intentions," Harold Sirkin, the report’s co-author, said.
Fifty-four per cent said they were interested in re-shoring, about the same as last year.
to read the report.
StaffingIndustry.com October 24 2014 03:05:53 PM
Median weekly earnings of US full-time wage and salary workers rose 2.5 percent year over year in the third quarter to $790 (not seasonally adjusted), the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced today.
Women who usually worked full time had median weekly earnings of $715, or 82.2 percent of the $870 median for men.
For workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher, the median was $1,170, and for workers with a high school diploma only the median was $681.
Among occupations, workers in the management, professional and related occupations posted the highest median weekly earnings at $1,326 for men and $980 for women. Earnings were lower in service jobs where the median earnings were $585 for men and $467 for women.
Read the original article at StaffingIndustry.com HERE
Staffing Industry Analysts September 22 2014 12:34:13 PM
Small businesses expect to have a profitable second half of the year, according to the SurePayroll Small Business Scorecard survey for September. The survey found 81 percent of small business owners expect to be profitable in the second half of the year, up from 77 percent in June. Optimism among small business owners rose to 73 percent, its second highest point in 2014; it reached 75 percent in May.
Fifty percent said they would make investments in their business in the fourth quarter, up from 44 percent at this time last year. Of those planning to make new investment, 52 percent said they would do so by adding new staff.
However, hiring edged down 0.1 percent from August and 0.7 percent year over year.
“The businesses that we work with are your mom and pop shops, your really tight-knit operations with just two or three employees, and a really high number of them have worked their way into profitability,” said SurePayroll General Manager Andy Roe on the hiring increase. “It’s tremendous and the excitement is really back in the air for small businesses heading into the year-end stretch. We'll look to see more investment from business owners in staff, marketing and technology, as well as new equipment and even office space for some.”
SurePayroll’s Scorecard compiles data from more than 40,000 small businesses and exclusively reflects the trends affecting businesses with one to 10 employees. The average business reflected has six employees. SurePayroll Inc. provides online payroll services to small businesses. It is a subsidiary of Paychex Inc. (NASD: PAYX).
Read the original story at StaffingIndustry.com HERE
globalnews.ca August 6 2014 04:05:44 PMYou'd be forgiven for believing there is a simple list of obvious things we'd all agree should not be done in a job interview. But, as with common sense not actually being so common in practice, interviewees can and have done the darndest things to unwittingly undermine their chances of getting a position. Below is an original article from Tamara Elliott at Global News which provides guidance on common interview slip-ups. The original article can be found HERE.
Hunting for a new gig? It turns out you could derail your chance of getting hired before the interview even starts.
Staffing company Express Employment Professionals has released a list of the top five interview mistakes that people make. They include lying about experience, checking a cell phone, arriving late, answering a phone call and acting arrogant.
“It takes a great deal of effort to secure an interview for most jobs, so it baffles me that anyone would throw away that opportunity by lying or arriving late,” says Bob Funk, the CEO of Express Employment Professionals. “But believe it or not, these things happen.
He adds that there are simple steps that every interviewee should take.
“My advice is don’t even think about answering your phone, texting on your phone, or even looking at your phone,” Funk says. “In fact, turn your phone off before entering the building. If an employer sees you can’t take an interview seriously, I promise he or she won’t trust that you can take the job seriously.”
The following list outlines the worst things an applicant can do during a job interview:
- Lie about experience- 79%
- Check phone- 63%
- Arrive late- 58%
- Act arrogant- 53%
- Answer a phone call- 53%
- Drink (alcohol)- 47%
- Badmouth boss or co-worker- 47%
- Not do homework/research- 16%
- Smoke- 16%
- Bad eye contact- 16%
- Bring a friend or relative- 16%
- Text message- 5%
- Dress inappropriately- 5%
- Use improper language or slang- 5%
- Chew gum- 5%
- Act nervous- 5%
- Not know weaknesses- 5%
QUARTZ July 8 2014 03:33:30 PMQUARTZ published a fascinating look at what STEM skills pay off the most when listed on a resume (and we'll also assume that the resume owners are actually capable of performing said skills...). The article pulls it's conclusions from an equally fascinating -- and detailed -- study put out by the Brooking Institution that looks at advertisement duration vs skill requirements for job listings.
Computer skills, unsurprisingly, come out high on the list, with Process Management, Automation Tools, Machine Learning, Load Runner and Big Data forming the top five skills in highest demand. "Big Data" and "Machine Learning" are obviously broad categories under which particular technical skills will also be in high demand.
Combining skills with industries yields an equally interesting list, led by: Credit Risk, Credit Analysis, Financial Solutions, New Biz Development, and Commercial Lending. Clearly, computer/IT skills combined with banking/finance is a high-demand combination.
Lastly, the study looked at how long it took to fill a position with particular skills. On average, QUARTZ researchers found that non-STEM job listings took an average of 33 days to fill, while STEM listings stayed open an average of 50 days. The hardest skills to fill: Verilog, NoSQL, Machine Learning, Apache Hadoop, and CISA.
Silicon Valley CEOs (and many from farther afield) are constantly complaining that good technical talent is expensive and in short supply. There’s something to their concerns. At every education level, jobs requiring STEM
(science, technology, engineering or math) skills in the US take far more time and money to fill than just about anything else, according to a new study from the Brookings Institution
Researcher Jonathan Rothwell, together with Burning Glass, a labor-market data analysis company, collected data on thousands of American job ads, the dates they opened and were taken down, and the skills that they require.
Google, for example, took an average of 97 days to fill computer-related jobs (primarily software engineers), 56 for sales, and 79 for management in the San Jose area (which encompasses Mountain View, where the firm’s headquarters are). About half of the jobs in Rothwell’s dataset that were posted for 70 days required high levels of STEM knowledge.
The dataset also tracks required skills, and identifies which ones pay off most handsomely. Computer skills make up a large portion. The average salary value of a skill is calculated from the averaged advertised salary of jobs that mention any particular ability.
Rothwell passed the detailed data on to Quartz, and we made the graphs below to show the average salary value for each skill. (We confined ourselves to skills with more than 2,000 job ads in the dataset.)
Some caveats: This isn’t a perfect dataset. It scrapes from a large set of job advertisements, not all of which include salary data. Some of the skills broken out are catch-alls, broad tags like “big data,” “machine learning,” and and “data modeling,” rather than skills with particular techniques or programming languages. Others, like “IT management,” “process management,” and “concept development” seem like proxies for managerial positions, which likely accounts for why jobs with these “skills” have higher high salary figures.
What’s more, these descriptions don’t identify the primary skill a job is hiring for, just those skills that were mentioned prominently in the listing. So some less consequential skills likely come out on top. And it will always be a combination of skills rather than any one that employers look for. But the data do provide a useful window into some of the specific skills and areas of knowledge that are in greatest demand. First, the data for computer-centric skills:
>>> Click HERE
to continue reading the article at QZ.com...